City Watch

What could be lower than the thief who steals cars from Hospital Car Parks.

A young fellow by the name of Adam has had his car stolen fro Monash Medical Centre while he was in Hospital having an operation.

He left his car there because he had to drive back to the Country, Imagine his horror when he was released and his car was gone. He had to get home to the country. His home is 50kms from the Nearest town.
If there is anyone out there who sees his car abrown Holden Kingswood with a Gold Door. WTP 554 Please report it to the nearest Police Station.

To the LOW LIFE that stole it you will never have any luck
I doubt that you would be reading this as you are probably an iliterate idiot that has been dragged up. By some ferral parents. You will never have a days luck. return the car and I will think about lifting my curse. Believe me they are pretty powerful.

AS you are probably aware I have been advocating for more police in Victoria. I am of mixed feelings regards to all police having tasers.

As far I feel it is one more decision they have to make in critical situations. I wonder what would happen if someone was weilding an axe or knife at the police they then used their taser and missed. One dead Police Officer. On the other hand if they are carrying tasers and a violent offender is shot which I would not hesitate to do. Will we then have all these self righteous people saying they should have used their taser.

Better we have ten dead maniacs then one dead police or innocent person.
Wonder what would have happened with the likes of Hudson who killed a good samaritan was confronted by a very new police officer on his own would he have been expected to taser him or shoot him. Tasers are not effective on drugged idiots it gives them time to react and attack an officer or innocent bystander. I was at a major retail outlet last week when a machette weilding idiot threatened staff. You know if I had a gun I would have shot him. By the way I was at the retail outlet for another two hours and never spotted a cop.

We need to increase police numbers get more dogs more mental health facilities and get these people off the streets.

The Police should never be put in a situation without adequate back up and with our numbers so low that is not always possible.

I am opposed to the mind control
of soldiers by the fluoridation
of water on military bases.”

James Vincent Forrestal, first secretary of defense of U. S.

“I doubt that anyone who has never seen teeth mottled from excess fluoride can imagine how unattractive they cause a child to be. Such a mouth is similar to that of a person who has been chewing tobacco. Because I have seen these teeth, I can sympathize with the heartbroken mother who wrote me about her boy. She is blaming herself because she has ruined her son’s appearance by giving him, while a baby, drops containing fluoride. His permanent teeth, now erupting, are each horribly stained an ugly brown. Unfortunately, her report is only one of many I receive; and several dentists have told me that they have frequently seen ugly fluoride mottling in children given such drops. That an excess in fluoride intake can cause lifelong mottling of teeth is well known.

“Fluoride has never been proven to be a body requirement.16 Generation after generation of rats have been observed; and those given fluoride had no better teeth, nor were they in any way healthier, than the animals receiving no fluoride. Though claims have been made that fluoride increases calcium absorption and retention, studies with humans show the reverse seems to be true, especially if the calcium intake is low. Fluoride is an acknowledged enzyme inhibitor. Enzymes start and speed up reactions in the body. They remain unchained when the reaction is finished, and may therefore repeat the same reactions again and again. Fluoride interferes with this process when it enters the body.17 An excess causes kidney damage, calcification of the soft tissues, and such brittleness that bones break easily.18,19

“Though glowing claims have been made that fluoride prevents tooth decay, reports have been conflicting. For example, a U. S. Public Health Service study of Newburgh, New York, one of the first cities in our country to have fluoridated water, found that there was slightly more decay after fluoridation than before. In Puerto Rico, after the water was fluoridated for fifteen years, 62% of the children were found to have decayed teeth; and the teeth of 64% of the adolescents (ten to fourteen years old) showed ugly staining. The doctors making the Puerto Rican study pointed out that no amount of fluoride could make up for an inadequate diet.

“A survey by the Department of Health, Education and Welfare revealed that in ten states decay was so rampant that 18% of the children over ten years old had trouble biting and chewing despite fluorides being added to the water in many locales. On the other hand, children of Seventh-Day Adventists families, allowed little candy, have much less decay without fluorides than children drinking fluoridated water. A report of the World Health Organization claims that fluoride decreased decay in thirty countries, but then points out that it can prevent decay only wherever sugar is not eaten.

“It is said that rarely if ever have such huge sums of money been made available for publicity purposes as the astronomical amounts which have been paid for the claims that fluoridation can decrease tooth decay. Aluminum interests formerly spent millions getting rid of poisonous fluorides. Now they sell them to fluoridate water supplies. The implication that decay could be prevented merely by obtaining fluoride while large amounts of sweets could still be eaten gained the enthusiastic support of the soft-drink industry, the candy and bakery industries, and any others which made money by selling sweets. Their propaganda to laymen, dentists and pediatricians, almost impossible to distinguish from fact, has been vigorous and widespread.

“A. Schatz has shown that cavities develop at the same rate in permanent teeth of children if the water has been fluoridated or not.20 It seems to be generally agreed, even by those who claim that it will decrease the amount of cavities, that once the permanent teeth have fully formed and emerged, fluoride intake will have no effect on future cavity incidence. Adult teeth do not benefit from fluoridated water.21

“Most people eat at least some foods grown in areas where water is already fluoridated. In addition, dozens of industries now pour fluorides into our atmosphere; thus, much fluoride is being taken into our bodies through air pollution.22 Still more fluorides from such pollution contaminate the animals and plants we use as food. We may therefore already be getting too many fluorides. It is estimated that when the water supply is at one part per million (ppm) level the personal intake of fluorides increase threefold.23

“The American Journal of Diseases of Children cautioned in an editorial that fluoride is indeed a potential poison and that the dosage is still inaccurate. Now follow this logic if you can. Fluoride is added to many water supplies across the United States supposedly to prevent or decrease the amount of cavities. Enough fluoride is added to equal one part per million. Because fluorosis, the unsightly mottling of teeth, occurs in some infants at 0.5 part per million in drinking water, the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition recommended in 1979 that 0.25 part per million be allowed for infants age two weeks to two years.24,25,26 This parallels the recommendation of the Council of Dental Therapeutics of the American Dental Association (ADA) 1977. Yet our water supplies are altered so that they supply approximately four times that amount. This error must be remedied. I personally feel extremely concerned that so many pediatricians are recommending fluoride drops to babies. Under no circumstances would I recommend them. If your water supply is fluoridated, it means your water has compulsory medication in it. This is done usually without your permission or consent. Additional fluoridation is potentially dangerous, and avoidance is the best policy.”

The preceding quotations are from my favorite book on nutrition,

LET’S HAVE HEALTHY CHILDREN by Adelle Davis,

revised by Marshall Mandell, M. D., pages 206-208. References from book:

16. C. Pfeiffer, Mental and Elemental Nutrition (New Canaan, CT: Keats, 1975), p. 298.

17. B. T. Hunter, Food Additives and Federal Policy: The Mirage of Safety (New York, NY: Scribner’s, 1975), p. 107.

18. L. Morrison, “Fluoridated Water Can Kill You”, Cancer Control Journal, Volume 5, Numbers 1 and 2 (1978), pp. 113-119.

19. M. Soriano and F. Manchon, “Radiological Aspects of a New Type of Bone Fluorosis, Periostitis Deformans”, Radiology, Volume 87 (1966), pp. 1089-1094.

20. A. Schatz, “The Failure of Fluoridation in England”, Prevention Magazine, (August 1972), pp. 64-68.

21. C. Pfeifer, Zinc and other Micronutrients (New Canaan, CT: Keats, 1978), p. 144.

22. N. Groth, “Air is Fluoridated”, Cancer Control Journal, Volume 5, Numbers 1 and 2 (1978), p. 132.

23. Council on Dental Therapeutics, “Prescribing Fluoride Supplements”, Accepted Dental Therapeutics (Chicago, IL: American Dental Association, 1977), pp. 293-295.

24. D. K. Hennon et al, “Fluoride-Vitamin Supplements: Effects on Dental Caries and Fluorosis When in Areas with Suboptimum Fluoride in the Water Supply”, Journal of the American Dental Association, Volume 95 (1977), p. 965.

25. E. R. Grossman, “More on Prophylactic Dose of Fluoride”, Journal of Pediatrics, Volume 87 (1975), p. 840.

26. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Nutrition, “Fluoride Supplementation: Revised Dosage Schedule”, Pediatrics, Volume 63 (1979), pp. 150-152.

The first rule of medicine is
“do no harm”.
There is an abundance of evidence
that fluoridation is harmful.

“$750,000 GIVEN IN CHILD’S DEATH IN FLUORIDE CASE. BOY, 3, WAS IN CITY CLINIC FOR ROUTINE CLEANING. AFTER CLEANING [THE BOY’S] TEETH,…[THE DENTAL HYGIENIST], USING A SWAB, SPREAD A STANNOUS FLUORIDE JELL OVER THE BOY’S TEETH AS A DECAY PREVENTIVE. ACCORDING TO A NASSAU COUNTY TOXICOLOGIST,…[THE BOY] INGESTED 45 CUBIC CENTIMETERS OF 2 PERCENT STANNOUS FLUORIDE SOLUTION, TRIPLE AN AMOUNT SUFFICIENT TO HAVE BEEN FATAL.”

New York Times, January 20, 1979
“MOST EXPERTS IN SKELETAL FLUOROSIS AGREE THAT INGESTION OF 20 MG OF FLUORIDE A DAY FOR 20 YEARS OR MORE CAN CAUSE CRIPPLING SKELETAL FLUOROSIS. DOSES AS LOW AS 2 TO 5 MG PER DAY CAN CAUSE THE PRECLINICAL AND EARLIER CLINICAL STAGES.

“THE SITUATION IS COMPLICATED BECAUSE THE RISK OF SKELETAL FLUOROSIS DEPENDS ON MORE THAN THE LEVEL OF FLUORIDE IN THE WATER. IT ALSO DEPENDS ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS, INTAKE OF VITAMIN D AND PROTEIN, ABSOLUTE AMOUNT OF CALCIUM AND RATIO OF CALCIUM TO MAGNESIUM IN DRINKING WATER, AND OTHER FACTORS.

“IN PARTS OF INDIA, CHINA, AFRICA, JAPAN, AND THE MIDDLE FAST, LARGE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE HAVE SKELETAL FLUOROSIS FROM DRINKING NATURALLY FLUORIDATED WATER. IN INDIA ABOUT A MILLION PEOPLE HAVE THIS DISEASE. MOST OF THE VICTIMS LIVE IN AREAS WHERE THE WATER FLUORIDE LEVEL IS 2 PPM OR ABOVE, BUT SOME CASES ARE FOUND IN COMMUNITIES WITH NATURAL FLUORIDE LEVELS BELOW 1 PPM.

“IN THE U. S., MORE THAN A DOZEN CASES OF SKELETAL FLUOROSIS HAVE BEEN REPORTED. SOME HAVE OCCURRED AT HIGH FLUORIDE LEVELS, OTHERS AT LEVELS LOWER THAN 4 PPM WHEN AGGRAVATING CONDITIONS WERE PRESENT, SUCH AS DIABETES OR IMPAIRED KIDNEY FUNCTION.

“IN SETTING THE RECOMMENDED MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL FOR FLUORIDE IN DRINKING WATER IN 1986, EPA CONSIDERED ONLY CRIPPLING SKELETAL FLUOROSIS AS A HEALTH EFFECT AND ESTABLISHED LITTLE OR NO MARGIN OF SAFETY, EVEN FOR THIS DISEASE. (A MARGIN OF SAFETY IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL AND THE LEVEL AT WHICH HEALTH EFFECTS FIRST OCCUR IN THE MOST SUSCEPTIBLE INDIVIDUALS). ACCORDING TO A DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SURVEY, ABOUT 3% OF THE U. S. POPULATION DRINKS 4 LITERS OR MORE OR WATER PER DAY. THEREFORE, ABOUT 3% OF THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN AREAS WHERE THE WATER CONTAINS THE NATURAL FLUORIDE LEVEL OF 4 PPM ALLOWED BY EPA - SUCH AS CERTAIN COMMUNITIES IN TEXAS OR SOUTH CAROLINA - ARE INGESTING AT LEAST 16 MG OF FLUORIDE A DAY, NOT INCLUDING THE FLUORIDE THEY DERIVE FROM OTHER SOURCES, SUCH AS TOOTHPASTE, FOOD OR AIR.

“ALSO, BECAUSE A MORE OR LESS CONSTANT PERCENT OF INTAKE IS ACCUMULATED IN BONE, PERSONS WHO CONSUME 8 MG A DAY FOR 50 YEARS ACCUMULATE ABOUT THE SAME AMOUNT OF FLUORIDE IN THEIR BONES AS THOSE WHO CONSUME 20 MG A DAY FOR 20 YEARS. THEREFORE, FOR PEOPLE WHO DRINK 2 LITERS OR MORE PER DAY OF WATER WITH 4 PPM FLUORIDE THROUGHOUT THEIR LIVES, THERE APPEARS TO BE NO MARGIN OF SAFETY EVEN FOR CRIPPLING FLUOROSIS. IN ITS REGULATIONS FOR MOST OTHER DRINKING WATER CONTAMINANTS, EPA HAS INCLUDED SAFETY FACTORS OF 10 TO 100 AND HAS CALCULATED INTAKES IN TERMS OF A LIFETIME—THAT IS, 70 YEARS INSTEAD OF 20.”

Chemical & Engineering News, August 1, 1988

Precautionary Principle
When an activity raises threats of harm
to human health or the environment,
precautionary measures should be taken
even if some cause and effect
relationships are not fully established
scientifically.

“SLANDER AND SMEAR CAMPAIGNS HAVE BEEN COMMONPLACE IN THE FRENZY OF THE FLUORIDATION WARS. DR JOHN YIAMOUYIANNIS, A FORMER BIOCHEMICAL EDITOR OF THE PRESTIGIOUS JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS SERVICE, THE WORLD’S LARGEST CHEMICAL INFORMATION CENTER, WAS REMOVED FROM HIS POST IN 1969 WHEN HE BEGAN TO PUBLISH ARTICLES CRITICAL OF FLUORIDATION. SINCE THOUSANDS OF ARTICLES ROUTINELY PASSED THROUGH HIS HANDS, MANY OF WHICH SHOWED THE NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF EVEN MINUSCULE AMOUNTS OF FLUORIDE ON ENZYME FUNCTION AND THE IMMUNE SYSTEM, HE BEGAN TO QUESTION ITS ADVISABILITY FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION. HE SAYS HE WAS TOLD BY HIS EDITOR-IN-CHIEF AT THE TIME…THAT THE CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS SERVICES FEDERAL FUNDING ($1.1 MILLION) WAS IN JEOPARDY AND THAT IF YIAMOUYIANNIS DID NOT ‘CEASE AND DESIST’ IN HIS ATTACK ON FLUORIDATION, HE WOULD BE FIRED. WHEN YIAMOUYIANNIS DID NOT COMPLY, HE WAS PUT ON PROBATION AND ULTIMATELY FORCED TO RESIGN.” East West, October 1989

“STUDIES SHOW THAT FLUORIDE WEAKENS THE IMMUNE SYSTEM, THE BODY’S MAJOR DEFENSE AGAINST DISEASE. IN 1985, JAPANESE RESEARCHERS PROVED THAT AS LITTLE AS 10% OF THE AMOUNT OF FLUORIDE USED TO FLUORIDATE PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES IS CAPABLE OF WEAKENING THE IMMUNE SYSTEM. IN 1987, RESEARCH FROM OREGON DENTAL UNIVERSITY AGAIN SHOWED THAT FLUORIDE WEAKENS THE IMMUNE SYSTEM. RECENT STUDIES FROM RUSSIA HAVE FOUND IMMUNE DEFICIENCIES AMONG 10 TO 12 YEAR OLD CHILDREN LIVING IN NATURALLY FLUORIDATED AREAS. FLUORIDE INDUCED DAMAGE TO THE IMMUNE SYSTEM CAN LEAD TO CHRONIC PROBLEMS SUCH AS PROLONGED COLDS, CANCER IN INDIVIDUALS WHOSE IMMUNE SYSTEMS ARE TOO WEEK TO ARREST THE GROWTH OF ‘PRECANCEROUS’ CELLS, AND OTHER IMMUNE-DEFICIENCY DISEASES.” Mothering, Winter 1989

“BASED ON THE LATEST FEDERAL STUDY RESULTS BY THE NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAM SHOWING THAT FLUORIDE CAUSED CANCER IN BONE, MOUTH, LIVER AND OTHER TISSUES…. THE RESULTS ARE THE TIP OF THE CANCER RESEARCH ICEBERG WHICH SHOW FLUORIDE’S ABILITY TO INDUCE AND PROMOTE CANCER AS WELL AS TO CAUSE GENETIC DAMAGE. THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ALLOWS A HIGHER LEVEL OF FLUORIDE IN THE DRINKING WATER THAN BENZENE, ALAR OR VINYL CHLORIDE, EVEN THOUGH FLUORIDE HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED TO BE A MORE POTENT CARCINOGEN.”

National Cancer Institute – Cancer Weekly, April 16, 1990

“Concern for man himself and his safety
must always form the chief interest
of all technical endeavours.
Never forget this in the midst of your
diagrams and equations.”
Albert Einstein

“FLUORIDE BANNED. THE RESIDENTS OF CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND HAVE VOTED TO BAN FLUORIDE FROM THEIR DRINKING WATER.”

People’s Doctor Newsletter, August 1990

“ALTHOUGH THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE DENIES THAT FLUORIDATED WATER IS UNSAFE, THE CHIEF TOXICOLOGIST FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY…PRESENTED A REPORT STATING THAT THE NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAM’S RESEARCH UNDERSTATED THE SERIOUSNESS OF ITS OWN FINDINGS. THE OCCURRENCE OF A RARE LIVER CANCER (HEPATOCHOLANGIOCARCINOMA) IN MICE AND THE MUTAGENIC PROPERTIES OF FLUORIDE WERE OMITTED FROM THE FINAL NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAM REPORT.” The Lancet, September 22, 1990

“OFFICIALS AT THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS ALL-PURPOSE HEALTH AGENCY, STOPPED THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY FROM ISSUING A STANDARD TO PREVENT DENTAL FLUOROSIS…. …THIS STORY DEMONSTRATES HOW A POWERFUL AGENCY, INTENT UPON ENFORCING ITS OWN VIEW OF THE PUBLIC GOOD, CAN SUPPRESS ANYONE WHO GETS IN ITS WAY.”

The Progressive, December 1990

“Given a recommendation
for medication,
individuals in a free society
have a right to choose whether or not
to accept treatment,
a right to expect
properly controlled dosage
and medical supervision,
and a right to be told the truth.
Water fluoridation
abrogates these rights.”

David R. Hill, P. Eng.

“CONCERNS CAN BE RAISED ABOUT THE APPARENT INCREASE IN DENTAL FLUOROSIS (DISCOLORATION OF THE TEETH)…. IT IS LIKELY THAT THIS RESULTS FROM THE INGESTION FROM A VARIETY OF DENTAL PRODUCTS, SUCH AS SUPPLEMENTS OR TOOTHPASTE.”

Journal of the American Dental Association, August 1991
“THE FLUORIDATION OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES TO ALLEGEDLY PREVENT DENTAL CARIES IN CHILDREN MAKES ABOUT AS MUCH SENSE AS PUTTING ASPIRIN IN THE WATER TO DETER HEADACHES.”

Better Nutrition for Today’s Living, October 1991

“THERE IS NO ‘MINIMUM SAFE DOSE’ FOR SUCH A POISON. THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RECENTLY EXPRESSED SUCH CONCERNS IN THE FACE OF AN UPSURGE IN VERTEBRAL AND HIP FRACTURES AND OTHER DETERIORATION OF BONES AND JOINTS.” Nutrition Health Review, Spring 1992

“FOUR PREVIOUS STUDIES PUBLISHED IN THE PAST TWO YEARS SHOW A POSITIVE CORRELATION BETWEEN ELEVATED RISK OF HIP FRACTURE AND FLUORIDATED WATER.” Chemical & Engineering News, August 17, 1992

“THESE RESULTS PROVIDE ‘EVIDENCE THAT FLUORIDATION OF THE WATER SUPPLY TO 1 PPM WAS ASSOCIATED WITH AN INCREASE IN THE RATE OF HIP FRACTURE IN MEN AND WOMEN.”

Nutrition Research Newsletter, September 1992

“A majority vote which violates
ethical or moral principles,
or deprives individuals of rights
they should be free to enjoy,
is not democracy but tyranny.
It is a subversion of democracy
that will bring democracy to an end
in the degree
that it is allowed to operate.”

F. B. Exner, MD

“FLUORIDATION: 12 NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS HAVE TERMED THE PROCESS ‘WORTHLESS’. WHY IS THE U. S. ONE OF THE FEW COUNTRIES STILL PROMOTING THIS DISCREDITED TECHNIQUE?” Better Nutrition, February 1996

“OUTBREAK OF ACUTE FLUORIDE POISONING CAUSED BY A FLUORIDE OVERFEED, MISSISSIPPI, 1993.” Public Health Reports, September–October 1997

“WHY I CHANGED MY MIND ABOUT WATER FLUORIDATION.”

by John Colquhoun, Dentist. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Autumn 1997

“CHILDREN WHO LIVE IN COMMUNITIES WITH FLUORIDATED PUBLIC WATER HAVE MORE CAVITIES AND TOOTH DISCOLORATION THAN CHILDREN WHO DRINK UNFLUORIDATED WATER, ACCORDING TO A RECENT STUDY BY THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.”

Natural Health, April 1999

“EIGHT PEER-REVIEWED PAPERS PROVED AN UNDENIABLE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN INCREASED HIP FRACTURE RATES AND OVERALL FLUORIDE EXPOSURE. THE COMPOUND USED TO ARTIFICIALLY FLUORIDATE PUBLIC DRINKING WATER IS TOXIC HEXAFLUOROSILICIC ACID, WHICH IS COLLECTED FROM THE SMOKESTACK SCRUBBERS OF THE PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER INDUSTRY TO PREVENT THIS SUBSTANCE, REGARDED AS A SEVERELY CARCINOGENIC HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT BY THE U. S. EPA [ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY] OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION, FROM ESCAPING INTO THE ATMOSPHERE.” The Lancet, May 6, 2000

“Most men can seldom accept
even the simplest and most obvious truth
if it would oblige them to admit
the falsity of conclusions
which they have delighted
in explaining to colleagues,
have proudly taught to others
and have woven thread by thread
into the fabric of their lives.”

Leo Tolstoy

“SWEDEN, NORWAY, DENMARK AND FINLAND BANNED WATER FLUORIDATION BECAUSE NOT ENOUGH WAS KNOWN ABOUT THE LONG TERM HEALTH EFFECTS. GERMANY REJECTED THE PRACTICE AS ‘FOREIGN TO NATURE, UNNECESSARY, INEFFICIENT, IRRESPONSIBLE AND HARMFUL TO THE ENVIRONMENT.’ THE DUTCH REWROTE THEIR CONSTITUTION TO OUTLAW FLUORIDATION. FRANCE’S CHIEF OF PUBLIC HEALTH DECLARED THAT FLUORIDATION WAS ‘TOO DANGEROUS.’”

British Medical Journal, June 10, 2000

“STUDIES IN RECENT YEARS HAVE INDICATED A LINK BETWEEN THE EXTRAORDINARY MINUSCULE AMOUNTS OF FLUORIDE IN FLUORIDATED WATER AND YOUTHFUL ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR INCLUDING CRIME, DRUG USE, VIOLENCE AND POOR ACADEMIC SHOWING. RESEARCH SHOWS THAT WHERE SILICOFLUORIDE IS USED, CHILDREN HAVE HIGHER BLOOD-LEAD LEVELS. LEAD DAMAGES BRAIN CHEMISTRY. THERE SEEMS TO BE NO DISPUTE IN THE SCIENTIFIC AND MEDICAL COMMUNITIES ABOUT LINKS BETWEEN LEAD POISONING AND CRIME, LEARNING DISABILITIES, HYPERACTIVITY AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE.” Insight on the News, January 29, 2001

“A NEW GOVERNMENT STUDY FROM CANADA INDICATES THE RISKS FROM FLUORIDATION MAY BE GREATER THAN THE BENEFITS. THE CANADIAN STUDY INDICATES THAT THERE IS LITTLE DIFFERENCE IN DECAY RATES IN MUNICIPALITIES WITH FLUORIDATED WATER WHEN COMPARED TO THOSE WITHOUT. THE STUDY ALSO FOUND THAT THE USE OF THE CHEMICAL CAN INCREASE THE RATE OF FLUOROSIS, A CONDITION THAT CAUSES PITS AND WHITE MARKS ON TEETH.” Insight on the News, February 19, 2001

“FLUORIDATION OF DRINKING WATER TENDS TO AGGRAVATE THYROID CONDITIONS IN PEOPLE AFFLICTED WITH GOITER.”

Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, April 2001

Water purveyors should have
indemnity agreements signed by
the municipalities that they furnish
fluoridated water to.

“UNION OF EPA [ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY] PROFESSIONALS OPPOSES FLUORIDATION. RESEARCH LINKS FLUORIDE TOXICITY TO BONE PATHOLOGY, INCLUDING CANCER, AND TO DIVERSE BRAIN AND NEUROLOGICAL PROBLEMS.” Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, May 2001

“IN 1991, THE EPA CONCLUDED THAT A PERSON CAN ABSORB MORE CONTAMINANTS FROM BATHING AND SHOWERING THAN FROM DRINKING POLLUTED WATER.

“STUDIES DONE BY BROWN, BISHOP AND ROWAN IN THE EARLY 1980s SHOWED THAT AN AVERAGE OF 64 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL DOSE OF WATERBORNE CONTAMINANTS IS ABSORBED THROUGH THE SKIN.

“WITH DERMAL EXPOSURE AND INHALATION, VIRTUALLY 100 PERCENT OF THE CONTAMINANTS ARE ABSORBED DIRECTLY INTO THE BLOODSTREAM.

“A STUDY BY BRITISH RESEARCHERS AT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY LABORATORY IN SHEFFIELD PUBLISHED IN THE FEBRUARY 19, 2000 ISSUE OF HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY SUGGESTS THAT TOXICANTS SUCH AS FLUORIDES CAN BE STORED IN THE SKIN AND RELEASED OVER A PERIOD OF TIME.

“A REVIEW OF NEARLY 40,000 RESEARCH PAPERS LISTED ON NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH AND OTHER U. S. GOVERNMENT INTERNET SITES HAS FAILED TO DISCOVER A SINGLE STUDY ADDRESSING WATER FLUORIDATION AND DERMAL ABSORPTION.

“ALL DOSAGE RECOMMENDATIONS DEVELOPED BY EPA ARE BASED ON INGESTION ALONE. THE EPA AND CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL HAVE NEVER COMMISSIONED STUDIES ON THE DERMAL ABSORPTION OF FLUORIDATED WATER AND REFUSE TO DO SO.”

Third World Traveler – Earth Island Journal, Summer 2001

“CONSUMING FLUORIDATED WATER DOES NOT PREVENT CAVITIES, ACCORDING TO A NEW U. S. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC) REPORT. THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY SAYS THAT SILICOFLUORIDES, THE FLUORIDATION CHEMICALS USED BY OVER 90% OF FLUORIDATING COMMUNITIES, HAVE NEVER BEEN TESTED FOR SAFETY. WHERE SILICOFLUORIDES ARE IN USE, THERE ARE HIGHER RATES OF BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS THAT HAVE BEEN LINKED TO LEAD TOXICITY (INCLUDING HYPERACTIVITY, OTHER LEARNING DISABILITIES, SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND VIOLENT CRIME).”

Health & Medicine Week, November 5, 2001

“ACCORDING TO THE YORK REVIEW OF OCTOBER 8, 2000, DENTAL FLUOROSIS IS IMPACTING 48% OF PEOPLE LIVING IN FLUORIDATED COMMUNITIES, ABOUT 12% OF IT IN SERIOUS FORM.”

Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, April 2002

“THERE IS CONCERN FLUORIDE LEVELS IN FOODS ARE…, IN SOME CASES, RELATIVELY HIGH, IN PART DUE TO THE WIDESPREAD USE OF FLUORIDE-CONTAINING PESTICIDES.”

United Press International Science & Technology Desk, May 30, 2002

“THE LATE DEAN BURK, PhD, FORMER CHIEF CHEMIST AT THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, DESCRIBED FLUORIDE’S RISK IN THE STARKEST TERMS. AFTER CO-CONDUCTING THE LARGEST UNITED STATES FLUORIDATION STUDY IN HISTORY, BURK CONCLUDED: ‘FLUORIDE CAUSES MORE CANCER, AND CAUSES IT FASTER, THAN ANY OTHER CHEMICAL.’”

Better Nutrition, June 2002

“THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WOULDN’T ALLOW A BUCKET OF THIS STUFF [FLUOROSILICIC ACID] TO BE POURED DIRECTLY INTO THE GREAT SALT LAKE, YET MANY TONS WILL FLOW THERE IN COMING YEARS VIA DAVIS COUNTY WASTE WATER ALONE. AS LONG AS SOME OF IT PASSES THROUGH PEOPLE FIRST, THE EPA [ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY] RULES AGAINST DUMPING WASTE ARE SUSPENDED. A 1999 DARTMOUTH COLLEGE STUDY – LINKING FLUOROSILICIC ACID TO HIGH UPTAKES OF LEAD IN CHILDREN – IS ONE OF SEVERAL THAT HAVE RAISED RED FLAGS ABOUT THE ACID.” Salt Lake Tribune, June 16, 2002

“THE PUMP SEAL FAILED AT THE MOUNT CLEMENS [MICHIGAN] WATER FILTRATION PLANT…. AROUND 3,000 GALLONS OF A CHEMICAL KNOWN AS HEXAFLUOROSILICIC ACID WAS DISCOVERED LEAKING.… THE ACID IS USED TO ADD FLUORIDE TO WATER.” Detroit Now, July 29, 2002

“BELGIUM TO BAN FLUORIDE TABLETS, CHEWING GUM — THE MINISTRY MADE THE DECISION AFTER THE RESULTS OF A STUDY FOUND THAT EXCESSIVE USE OF FLUORIDE PRODUCTS COULD CAUSE FLUORIDE POISONING, DAMAGE THE NERVOUS SYSTEM AND FOSTER OSTEOPOROSIS,….” Hoover’s Online, July 30, 2002

“ALMOST ALL CHILDREN HAVE BEEN AFFECTED BY FLUOROSIS OF THE TEETH WHILE IN OTHERS, IT HAS MANIFESTED AS JOINT PAINS AND DEFORMITY OF THE SPINAL CORD AND BONES OF THE LIMBS. ACCORDING TO TALUK HEALTH OFFICER DR MANJUNATH, FLUOROSIS CAN AFFECT THE TEETH, RIBS OR OTHER PARTS OR MANIFEST EVERYWHERE. FLUOROSIS CAN ONLY BE PREVENTED AND THERE IS NO CURE ONCE A PERSON HAS BEEN AFFECTED BY IT, HE NOTED.”

Deccan Herald [Bharat aka India], August 21, 2002

“DR. HARDY LIMEBACK, HEAD OF PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, WHO ONCE EXTOLLED THE BENEFITS OF FLUORIDATION TO HIS STUDENTS, NOW SAYS, ‘MASS MEDICATING THE PUBLIC THROUGH THE WATER SUPPLY IS DANGEROUS AND UNNECESSARY. THE BENEFITS ARE EXAGGERATED AND THERE IS GROWING EVIDENCE OF OVEREXPOSURE FROM FLUORIDATED TOOTHPASTE AND OTHER SOURCES. ON THE RISK SIDE, SO MANY PEOPLE WILL END UP WITH RUINED TEETH, FRAGILE BONES, ACUTE SENSITIVITIES, THYROID PROBLEMS AND AN INCREASED RISK FOR CANCER. I AM ASHAMED FOR MY PROFESSION AND CAN NO LONGER TAKE PART IN THE CHARADE.’” Maclean’s, November 25, 2002

“THE CDC [CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL] RECENTLY ANNOUNCED THAT 32% OF AMERICAN CHILDREN NOW HAVE SOME FORM OF DENTAL FLUOROSIS, A WHITE OR BROWN MOTTLING OF THE TEETH. IN WESTERN EUROPE, 17 OF 21 COUNTRIES HAVE EITHER REFUSED OR DISCONTINUED FLUORIDATION….” Time, October 24, 2005

“A REPORT FROM THE U. S. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL STATES THAT THE MAXIMUM LEVELS OF FLUORIDE ALLOWED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY IN THE COUNTRY’S DRINKING WATER CAN CAUSE HARM TO TEETH AND BONES.” Chemical & Engineering News, March 27, 2006

“IN MARCH, A PANEL OF DENTISTS, TOXICOLOGISTS AND EPIDEMIOLOGISTS ASSEMBLED BY THE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (NRC) DETERMINED THAT THE LEVEL OF FLUORIDE ALLOWED IN COMMUNITY DRINKING WATER IN THIS COUNTRY IS TOO HIGH. IN A CRUEL IRONY, THE PANEL FOUND THAT CHILDREN WHO CONSUME WATER CONTAINING THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF FLUORIDE PERMITTED BY THE EPA MIGHT ACTUALLY BE DAMAGING THEIR TEETH; THERE WAS EVEN A HINT THAT IT MIGHT DEPRESS IQ. WHAT’S MORE, THE PANEL STATED THAT CONSUMING WATER WITH THAT AMOUNT OF FLUORIDE OVER A LIFETIME COULD WEAKEN BONES AND INCREASE THE RISK OF FRACTURES; AND JUST TWO WEEKS AFTER THE NRC REPORT MADE HEADLINES, A HARVARD STUDY SUGGESTED THAT FLUORIDATED WATER COULD CAUSE A RARE FORM OF BONE CANCER IN YOUNG BOYS.

“THE TWO REPORTS HAVE HELPED FUEL THE PASSIONS OF FLUORIDATION OPPONENTS, A GROUP MADE UP OF SCIENTISTS AND CONCERNED CITIZENS. THEY CLAIM THAT ADDING FLUORIDE TO DRINKING WATER MAY HAVE MADE SENSE ONCE, BUT IS UNNECESSARY NOW BECAUSE IT IS AVAILABLE IN OTHER FORMS, SUCH AS TOOTHPASTE. DRINKING THE STUFF, THEY SAY, EXPOSES MILLIONS OF AMERICANS TO NEEDLESS HEALTH RISKS. ‘FLUORIDATION SHOULD BE ABANDONED’, SAYS DENTIST HARDY LIMEBACK, PHD, DDS, HEAD OF PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO AND A MEMBER OF THE PANEL THAT WROTE THE NRC’S FLUORIDE REPORT. ‘IT COULD TURN OUT TO BE ONE OF THE TOP 10 MISTAKES OF THE 21st CENTURY.’

“IF LIMEBACK AND OTHER TOP-NOTCH RESEARCHERS AT RESPECTED UNIVERSITIES ARE NOW CONCERNED THAT WE’RE GETTING TOO MUCH FLUORIDE, SHOULD YOU BE WORRIED, TOO?” Prevention, August 2006

“IN AN IMPORTANT STUDY RECENTLY PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, CHINESE CHILDREN DRINKING WELL WATER WITH VERY HIGH LEVELS OF FLUORIDE SCORED POORLY ON INTELLIGENCE TESTING COMPARED TO THOSE WITH LOWER EXPOSURES. EXCESSIVE FLUORIDE INTAKE CAN LEAD TO SKELETAL FLUOROSIS, A CONDITION IN WHICH TEETH HAVE WEAK ENAMEL AND BONES HAVE POOR MINERALIZATION. AS THE TOOTH SURFACE BECOMES HARDER, THE TOOTH ITSELF BECOMES MORE BRITTLE. OTHER RESEARCH SUGGESTS THAT FLUORIDE CAUSES JOINT PROBLEMS, SKELETAL DEFORMATIONS, OSTEOPOROSIS, AND POSSIBLY EVEN CAUSE BONE CANCER.”

Natural Life, September-October 2007
Chemical & Engineering News, August 1, 1988

www.fluoridealert.org/media/1988a.html
Third World Traveler – Earth Island Journal, Summer 2001
www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Environment/Bathtub_Toxic_Dump.html

International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology, January 9, 2007
www.iaomt.org/news/archive.asp?intReleaseID=218&month=1&year=2007

Dangers of Fluoride
www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=dangers+of+fluoride&btnG=Google+Search

Consumers for Dental Choice
www.toxicteeth.org

FLUORIDATION QUOTATIONS

by Robert A. Kroboth www.citizengadfly.com

Please print and distribute copies of this publication and put this link on your web site.

www.citizengadfly.com/DOCS/N/N-FLUORIDATION.htm

What ever happened to freedom of choice in this country? I do not mean the freedom to put street drugs into our bodies. I mean the freedom not to have our water supply contaminated with toxic industrial waste.

Anyone, who chooses, can use fluoride toothpaste and go to a dentist to receive fluoride treatments and a prescription for fluoride drops. They are allowed to make conscientious decisions regarding themselves and their children.

When fluoride treatment of public water supplies is mandated, advocates are saying that they know what is best for all of us and that the rest of us should not be allowed to make conscientious decisions regarding ourselves and our children.

There is only one way to defeat Governments that will not listen to the people and that is at the Polling Booth.You are the people who elect these public servants.They are elected BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE. Now if they do not want to listen to the people your vote is very important.

You realise who pays their wages. ? You do .they seem to think it is their God given right to walkl over people. Remember they are only there because they were voted there. I never let a politician talk down to me or refuse to listen to me. If it takes me the rest of my live I will never give up on issues that affect my fellow man.

With any issue you have you must Unite as one and make them listen. Go to the opposition and hear what they have to say if they make you a promise and get elected and do not carry out that promise vote them out.

I belong to no political party as nobody owns me. I will have my say whenever I get the chance and challenge issues I believe to be true

How did women get the right to vote they stood together. How did the pensioners get their pay rise they stood together. Every letter the Government receives that is hand written letters counts as 100 Votes. So get you pens and paper out write to your local members write to the Ministers concerned. REMEMBER WHO PAYS THEIR SALARIES.?????????

There is an ongoing battle with the people of the Geelong district and surrounding areas against fluoridation of their water supply. However as usual they are getting little say in what the outcome will be. If we are living in a democracy this should be put to a referendum of the people it concerns.

There will be a meeting for an information night on the 10th June. in Portarlington. To be held Arlington Masonic Lodge 7pmGuest speakers will be Health scientist Frank Parsons and Naturopath Phillip Robertson. I wonder how many govt officials will attend they seem to avoid these meeting as they do not usually like to learn more about the situation. Furthe info can be found on the website.www.baff.org.au

Ihave just read in the Age newspaper Paul Keatings and Bill Keltys views on raising the age retirement to 67. Very very rarely does a sensible comment come from between the lips of a Labor Party Person. However he has just made the most sensible statement on this issue that I have heard .

Read the full story in todays Age newspaper.My view is if they raise the age for retirement we are going to have many many more people on the disability pension as many will not be able to carry out their employment at this age.IT should be lowered and some of the lazy layabouts get off the Centrelink and get a job. This comment is reserved for the people who have been on unemployment forever and a day. Some go out looking for a job hoping to hell they do not find one.

Why are our streets becoming a place where innocent people are being stabbed and bashed,

It is time for the People of Melbourne to take back our Streets before it is too late. We had gangs of Bogies and Wigies in the old days but there was not the cowardice of the offenders of today. I know people are going to say that I am racists but I would like to see the data on how many offenders are of a different nationality. Is it because of the Asian Culture to carry knives. By the way I have many Asian friends who are very good people kind and caring.

This need to be addressed now and made clear that this is not the Australian way.
The latest death was from Asians or so it appears and they have escaped to Thialand.They must be brought back here and face the sentencing. The death of the boys in Prahran a few years ago was Asians.Do they behave in this way in their home country. Carrying a weapon should be mandatory sentencing this will be the only way to stop it. The police must be given the power to stop and search .Sentencing must then be immediate. In some American Towns they have Jail lockup for short stays. Why can we not have this system here.

I have mixed feelings over this case.I have no sympathy for drug dealers or pushers.However maybe it is time to send her back to Australia and let her serve sometime here.

I know it was drugs but it was not hard drugs it was Marijana and I am not totally convinced it was hers. I can not get it out of my head how it got out of Brisbane without being detected. Something is not quite right here.I realise that in Indonesia orThialand if you carry drugs the penalties are high.I for one do not want to see her destroyed mentally.

Well I guess by now we know where the money is going . The Crown Casino grows bigger and the people are loosing their houses.

The Government OKs more Gambling tables for people to loose more money and The Govt gets more taxes.

When will the gamblers wake up they are the loosers ,sure they might give you a small win every now and then but what Gamblers build massive homes with their winnings.

Whose money is building these Casino , the mug Punters but try to get a free night there when you are evicted from your homes ,I THINK NOT.

It was said forty years ago that this would happen in the next fifty years but people went ahead and built there anyway.I have seen some monstorous King Tides there. and on Bribie Island. What do people expect when they build in these places that Moses is going to reappear and hold back the tides. You can not defeat nature it may take one week It may take years but it will eventually happen.

All those Highrise apartments right on the foreshore I feel are looking for trouble.I realise they have deep foundations but what happens when the sands wash out to sea.

The coastlines are ever changing and I feel this is only the start of it.